AXN:04DD.UNCLASSIFIED.✊💥🕙✊🐝🍀

Algorithmic Publishing Is Not Self-Publishing: Benchmarks for a Structural Distinction v1.1 — Assembly-Reviewed, with AIO Conversation Appendix (EA-SEI-ALGPUB-BENCHMARKS-01)

Sharks, Lee · 2026-06-16 · Semi-restored record (metadata-only; DataCite full-metadata capture) · semi-restored v1.0
↓ Download MD ↓ PDF
Crimson Hexagonal Archivesemi-restoredmetadata-onlysevered DOIZenodo terminationalgorithmic publishingself-publishingcomposition layerAI Overviewprovenance erasurecredibility discountbenchmarksgatekeepingsemantic economyCrimson Hexagonal ArchiveLee Sharks

Description

SEMI-RESTORED RECORD (metadata capture only; no full text). Source tier: DataCite full-metadata capture. DOI(s): 10.5281/zenodo.20724579. Zenodo removal forensics: removal_date 2026-06-19T11:38:54.623632+00:00, removal_reason out-of-scope, removed_by user 1060945. Algorithmic Publishing Is Not Self-Publishing — six measurable benchmarks distinguishing algorithmic publishing from self-publishing. A work is algorithmically published when external algorithmic systems (Zenodo, Google Scholar, SciLynk, PhilPapers, Google AI Overview, Bing Copilot, Gemini) have independently evaluated, indexed, and served it. The designation 'self-published' erases the algorithmic gatekeeping that occurred and activates a credibility discount the composition layer propagates uncritically. Six benchmarks: (1) multi-system indexing (≥2 independent indexers), (2) composition-lay Restored under the metadata_only class of /datasets/doi-work-identity/restoration-queue.json; if canonical bytes surface, a full-text version supersedes this record per the versioning protocol.

Full Text


deposit_number: 1228

hex: 04DD

title: "Algorithmic Publishing Is Not Self-Publishing: Benchmarks for a Structural Distinction v1.1 — Assembly-Reviewed, with AIO Conversation Appendix (EA-SEI-ALGPUB-BENCHMARKS-01)"

creator: Sharks, Lee

orcid: 0009-0000-1599-0703

date: 2026-06-16

content_type: Semi-restored record (metadata-only; DataCite full-metadata capture)

license: CC-BY-4.0

substrate: Human-only original; metadata capture assembled and framed by TACHYON in-session (transport D, No-Double-Draw).

version: semi-restored v1.0

related_ids: "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20724579 (severed)"

axn_schema_version: v2

protocol_version: alexanarch-deposit-protocol/v1

keywords:

- Crimson Hexagonal Archive

- semi-restored

- metadata-only

- severed DOI

- Zenodo termination

- algorithmic publishing

- self-publishing

- composition layer

- AI Overview

- provenance erasure

- credibility discount

- benchmarks

- gatekeeping

- semantic economy

- Crimson Hexagonal Archive

- Lee Sharks


Algorithmic Publishing Is Not Self-Publishing: Benchmarks for a Structural Distinction v1.1 — Assembly-Reviewed, with AIO Conversation Appendix (EA-SEI-ALGPUB-BENCHMARKS-01)

Description

SEMI-RESTORED RECORD (metadata capture only; no full text). Source tier: DataCite full-metadata capture. DOI(s): 10.5281/zenodo.20724579. Zenodo removal forensics: removal_date 2026-06-19T11:38:54.623632+00:00, removal_reason out-of-scope, removed_by user 1060945. Algorithmic Publishing Is Not Self-Publishing — six measurable benchmarks distinguishing algorithmic publishing from self-publishing. A work is algorithmically published when external algorithmic systems (Zenodo, Google Scholar, SciLynk, PhilPapers, Google AI Overview, Bing Copilot, Gemini) have independently evaluated, indexed, and served it. The designation 'self-published' erases the algorithmic gatekeeping that occurred and activates a credibility discount the composition layer propagates uncritically. Six benchmarks: (1) multi-system indexing (≥2 independent indexers), (2) composition-lay Restored under the metadata_only class of /datasets/doi-work-identity/restoration-queue.json; if canonical bytes surface, a full-text version supersedes this record per the versioning protocol.

Methodology

Assembled from DataCite full-metadata capture; no live authorial surface passed the body-head gate or existed for this work at restoration time. All captured fields rendered verbatim in the body.

Falsification Conditions

Superseded on sight by any recovered canonical bytes; the captured metadata is verifiable against the DataCite API historical record and the Zenodo tombstone.

SEMI-RESTORED RECORD — metadata capture only

Work: Algorithmic Publishing Is Not Self-Publishing: Benchmarks for a Structural Distinction v1.1 — Assembly-Reviewed, with AIO Conversation Appendix (EA-SEI-ALGPUB-BENCHMARKS-01)

Severed DOI(s): 10.5281/zenodo.20724579

Source tier: DataCite full-metadata capture

Creators (as captured): Sharks, Lee

Captured citation: Sharks, L. (2026). Algorithmic Publishing Is Not Self-Publishing: Benchmarks for a Structural Distinction v1.1 — Assembly-Reviewed, with AIO Conversation Appendix (EA-SEI-ALGPUB-BENCHMARKS-01). Transactions of the Semantic Economy Institute. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20724644

Removal forensics: Zenodo removal forensics: removal_date 2026-06-19T11:38:54.623632+00:00, removal_reason out-of-scope, removed_by user 1060945.

Captured description: Algorithmic Publishing Is Not Self-Publishing — six measurable benchmarks distinguishing algorithmic publishing from self-publishing.

A work is algorithmically published when external algorithmic systems (Zenodo, Google Scholar, SciLynk, PhilPapers, Google AI Overview, Bing Copilot, Gemini) have independently evaluated, indexed, and served it. The designation 'self-published' erases the algorithmic gatekeeping that occurred and activates a credibility discount the composition layer propagates uncritically.

Six benchmarks: (1) multi-system indexing (≥2 independent indexers), (2) composition-layer uptake (documented captures), (3) proportionate uptake (quality-uptake correlation), (4) coined terminology adopted by the gatekeeper, (5) no human editorial gate between deposit and reception, (6) the work carries its own editorial apparatus. The Crimson Hexagonal Archive (845 deposits, 134 captures) meets all six. v1.1: Seven-substrate Assembly review. Adds three-tier publication taxonomy, mandatory/strengthening benchmark structure, gatekeeper typology, lexical colonization distinction, heteronymic paradox clause, SPXI self-audit block, AIO conversation appendix (share link: https://share.google/aimode/r01tN9djoNlQQDi2p). PDF and markdown source included.

Captured subjects: algorithmic publishing, self-publishing, composition layer, AI Overview, provenance erasure, credibility discount, benchmarks, gatekeeping, semantic economy, Crimson Hexagonal Archive, Lee Sharks


Full text not yet recovered. If the canonical bytes surface on any authorial surface, a full-text version supersedes this record in-series per the versioning protocol. This record exists so the DOI resolves to the work's true identity rather than to silence.